"fine tune closest approach to target" has been more accurate before
Gordon-Dry opened this issue ยท 2 comments
Actually using dev #801 I see that I can't fine tune anymore as intended, I have to enter different values and by try and error coming near the desired result.
See:
-
I enter 200 km periapsis
https://i.imgur.com/8b81xQ1.png -
I get this (117.988 km periapsis)
https://i.imgur.com/gzBDOvQ.png
I have to repeat this about a dozen times or more to find a value to enter that makes the periapsis as I want it to be.
Maybe #1055