Essentials Faction Tags AND USING AUTORANK
JcAuleyJ opened this issue ยท 15 comments
I really hope you guys will actually read this and fix it.
So basically is what is going on is that in essentials I have a bunch of different faction tag colors for each rank. Now I use PEX with this plugin and it doesn't seem to react well. Basically it creates two different groups. One for PEX to control via the pex promote command, and another for autorank to control.
Arkandriel:
group: <----- PEX
- warrior
worlds:
world:
group: <--- AUTORANK
- adventurer
So when autorank promotes someone, because only PEX is hooked into essentials and not autorank, it changes the person's rank but not their faction tag color to match the rank. So here's how I think it should be.
Arkandriel:
group:
- warrior <------ PEX & AUTORANK
They should both control that so instead of this happening as a bug:
(Warrior Color: &2)(Adventurer Color: &3)
[&3FACTION TAG]-[&2RANK] <---- Faction tag sees warrior, but rank sees nomadic.
So the reason they do not follow is because they are on slightly different tracks on each player. Please fix this.
Contact me VIA bukkit for further questions. I do not like github and was forced to make an account to send this message.
~ EpikS4use
I don't think this is because of essentials, it looks like Autorank is just set up to use world specific groups. Can we see your Autorank config?
I'm not sure why you have different tracks for Autorank and PEX. You can just let Autorank perform /pex promote .
PS: Yes, I know you prefer messaging via Bukkit, but github is more centralised for us as developers.
Yea here it is.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Staartvin [email protected] wrote:
I'm not sure why you have different tracks for Autorank and PEX. You can
just let Autorank perform /pex promote .PS: Yes, I know you prefer messaging via Bukkit, but github is more
centralised for us as developers.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33896406
.
I'm guessing you added it as an e-mail attachement? Because github didn't forward it.
http://pastebin.com/Cdff4XdE <--- Log
http://pastebin.com/UVvHLiNZ <--- Config
warrior and savage are both valid ranks.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Staartvin [email protected] wrote:
Here you go:
http://dev.bukkit.org/bukkit-plugins/autorank/files/50-autorank-v2-8-beta/Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33913845
.
Yes it's in the attachments, just open up the config with notepad++ and the
text is in there. Would you like me to use pastebin instead or something?
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Armarr [email protected] wrote:
I'm guessing you added it as an e-mail attachement? Because github didn't
forward it.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33901369
.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Staartvin [email protected] wrote:
Yeah, please give us a pastebin link.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33913379
.
You're using an old version of Autorank. We do not support it anymore. You could update to the latest beta and this problem is probably fixed.
That's strange, I downloaded this only a few weeks ago. Alrighty I'll get
back to you when I have the latest version installed.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Staartvin [email protected] wrote:
You're using an old version of Autorank. We do not support it anymore. You
could update to the latest beta and this problem is probably fixed.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33913609
.
You probably clicked the big download button: it sends you to the latest non beta download. The latest well running version is a beta.
Oh crap. And I just did a restart installing the non-beta again. Can you
send me the link to the beta?
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Staartvin [email protected] wrote:
You probably clicked the big download button: it sends you to the latest
non beta download. The latest well running version is a beta.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-33913754
.