DriveBackupV2

DriveBackupV2

Bukkit Plugins
46.6k Downloads

There was an issue attempting to check for the latest DriveBackupV2 release

DLmass opened this issue ยท 2 comments

commented

Describe the bug

[16:00:43 INFO]: [Backup] There was an issue attempting to check for the latest DriveBackupV2 release
[16:00:43 WARN]: java.lang.NumberFormatException
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at DriveBackupV2.jar//ratismal.drivebackup.plugin.updater.UpdateChecker.getLatest(UpdateChecker.java:103)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at DriveBackupV2.jar//ratismal.drivebackup.plugin.updater.UpdateChecker$1.run(UpdateChecker.java:51)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_20_R2.scheduler.CraftTask.run(CraftTask.java:101)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at org.bukkit.craftbukkit.v1_20_R2.scheduler.CraftAsyncTask.run(CraftAsyncTask.java:57)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at com.destroystokyo.paper.ServerSchedulerReportingWrapper.run(ServerSchedulerReportingWrapper.java:22)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
[16:00:43 WARN]: 	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:840)

No idea what could be causing this. This error is being thrown upon restart.

To Reproduce

No idea

Screenshots / Videos

No response

Server and Plugin Versions

1.20.2
DriveBackupV2-1.6.1

Additional Context

No response

commented

Does your server have access to api.curseforge.com?
It appears it does not, You may want to check with your hosting provider and see if they are blocking anything

commented

We have the same issue on our server (Paper 1.20.4), but it does not happen all the time.
Looking back at the last two weeks it happened once or twice on the weekends and one time today. A different plugin also occasionally fails to check for updates. So there is a chance that, for us, its related to high network usage that results in a timeout for the request.

But more generally I'm wondering why the decision has been made to also print the stack trace if the update check fails? Seems a bit much to me, even if it is only marked as a warning.