sign exploit
Twi5TeD opened this issue ยท 4 comments
using latest version just downloaded and i can do the sign exploit again by doing &1&1[sell] can you fix this please
version https://gyazo.com/11ff8c59b6ae82d25d16dfe1d41438f9
https://gyazo.com/63b225135f80be1d1806032cde5d3b8e first sign shows when i only do &1[sell] and the bottom sign is when i do &1&1[sell]
also done when not op and while in debug mode
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:17] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.color - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.magic - false
[14:23:43] [Server thread/INFO]: [Essentials] checking if F64_Rx has essentials.signs.format - false
I have tested this on both b370 and b413 EssentialsX and have been unable to reproduce this bug.
Based on your output alone, you can already see that Essentials is denying colour in signs, so this must mean that another plugin is interfering and allowing colours into your sign. Please check all your plugins one by one.