bPermissions support
beyourgravity opened this issue ยท 5 comments
Hi,
I am using bPermissions 1.9.1 and Preciousstones 7.0.6, they don't seem to be compatible with each other. Currently Preciousstones grants ps to all users, not a select group as set up in bPermissions.
Is there an issue I should check, or is bPermissions just not supported currently?
I can confirm that PS does have an issue with bPermissions. I am using bPermissions 2.71 and PS 7.10. My "default" user group has no preciousstones permissions at all, yet someone in that group can still place a precious stone. I was able to get what I assume is the expected behavior by DENYING the permission. Essentially I used this setup
groups:
default:
permissions:
- ^preciousstones.benefit.create.forcefield
- ^preciousstones.benefit.create.protection
- ^preciousstones.benefit.create.unbreakable
The "^" denies a permission. Once I had done this, then members of the default group could place the block, but the block was not a field (I was testing with the city protection diamond block).
So it seems that an absence of permissions in this case is defaulting to granting the permissions. I have not tested further to see if full admin permissions are granted, but I can do so.
Yes, ghost, the problem was not that it wasn't "functioning". It does in fact function, the only downfall is like techdesign said, groups with no assigned permissions still can use preciousstones for some reason.
I'm making some changes right now. Sounds like a legit issue.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:09 PM, beyourgravity <
[email protected]
wrote:
Hi,
I am using bPermissions 1.9.1 and Preciousstones 7.0.6, they don't seem to
be compatible with each other. Currently Preciousstones grants ps to all
users, not a select group as set up in bPermissions.Is there an issue I should check, or is bPermissions just not supported
currently?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#114
