This is a new thing that i ran into... Not major issues and may be just for me. I am donating 50 dollars this eevening, have to do some work before that though.

I use PS stones like this....

I have ranks, which are time based, so each person gets 1, than 2 than 3 based on group. If someone donates for vip they get 4-6, this is inserted in the personal permissions in pex, so than it overides the group setting.

Now i added simple clans, and ran into the issues of if you want to run a clan the person buys the group with the permissions, so that they can place the benefit and damage stones and the clan fort stone, but civilians cannot. This Clan Leader or Clan Member group is the only group they have, which has the permissions for their 3 Protected Lot stones, Fort stone and all the benfit and damage ones. But when they go to donate the the new permissions is applies that allows them to have 6 stones and than overide the clan permission.

Example:
Clan leader has precsiousstones.limit7
Donor permission is preciousstones.limit6

when theu donate it will apply the new one the .limit6 over the .limit7
Donor permission is preciousstones.limit6
Clan leader has precsiousstones.limit7

Which gives them access to the 6 stones, but not the city lot and damage/benifits.

What could you do to allow the permissions nodes to merge, so use some from each...
such as below.

Current setup

.limit6 (6 Lot Stones)
.limit7 (3 Lot Stones, 1 Fort Lot, Damage and Benifits)

So if the permissions were merged it would take the highest one per.

so it would permit 6 lot stones, 1 fort lot, damage and benefits.

Thank you very much for your time.

What is the donation email so i can send that right away?

This was fixed.

Whats the max people you get on your server? I have the hardware but cannot push over 35, what did ubercraft for example to java server to get it to not lag or have issues?

-----Original Message-----
From: phaed420 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:00 PM
To: Underbalanced
Subject: Re: [PreciousStones] Permissions issue sort but more for just my situation of, possible to work with? (#184)

This was fixed.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#184 (comment)

I mean uber*

-----Original Message-----
From: phaed420 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:00 PM
To: Underbalanced
Subject: Re: [PreciousStones] Permissions issue sort but more for just my situation of, possible to work with? (#184)

This was fixed.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#184 (comment)

We've had 120 but with some lag, we can go up to 85 minimal lag. Most likely they are running a dedicated linux server, (a windows server will never have the same performance as a linux server) and have the worlds on ramdisks, probably running java in server mode.

We use the the following java settings:

java -server -Xms512m -Xmx10240m -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalPacing -XX:ParallelGCThreads=16 -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -XX:+AggressiveOpts -jar craftbukkit-1.1-R3.jar

I use I have the entire MC/java/SQL/web server all in ram.

-native -server -Xincgc -Xmx18000M -Xmn512M -XX:NewRatio=2 -XX:+UseThreadPriorities -XX:CMSFullGCsBeforeCompaction=1 -XX:SoftRefLRUPolicyMSPerMB=2048 -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+UseAdaptiveSizePolicy -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -Xnoclassgc -oss4M -ss4M -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=90 -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:UseSSE=4 -XX:+UseCMSCompactAtFullCollection -XX:+AggressiveOpts -cp

-----Original Message-----
From: phaed420 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:31 AM
To: Underbalanced
Subject: Re: [PreciousStones] Permissions issue sort but more for just my situation of, possible to work with? (#184)

We've had 120 but with some lag, we can go up to 85 minimal lag. Most likely they are running a dedicated linux server, (a windows server will never have the same performance as a linux server) and have the worlds on ramdisks, probably running java in server mode.

We use the the following java settings:

java -server -Xms512m -Xmx10240m -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalPacing -XX:ParallelGCThreads=16 -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -XX:+AggressiveOpts -jar craftbukkit-1.1-R3.jar

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#184 (comment)

If linux is run from a virtual machine, does it gain the performance for linuz virtually executing the server or would there be no gains? Hardware isnt so much issue as its the java/server

-----Original Message-----
From: phaed420 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 12:31 AM
To: Underbalanced
Subject: Re: [PreciousStones] Permissions issue sort but more for just my situation of, possible to work with? (#184)

We've had 120 but with some lag, we can go up to 85 minimal lag. Most likely they are running a dedicated linux server, (a windows server will never have the same performance as a linux server) and have the worlds on ramdisks, probably running java in server mode.

We use the the following java settings:

java -server -Xms512m -Xmx10240m -XX:PermSize=256m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalPacing -XX:ParallelGCThreads=16 -XX:+UseFastAccessorMethods -XX:+AggressiveOpts -jar craftbukkit-1.1-R3.jar

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#184 (comment)

No it would make it worse. Then you would have the huge performance impact of windows, plus another one of the virtualized OS.

The gains you get from linux comes from the fact that you can install a light distro like CentOS server which has only the necessary packages installed and nothing else, it doesn't even have GUI, its just a command line, then you would only install what is necessary for the bukkit server to run which would be java and that's it.

Windows on the other hand has hundreds of things running on it, including itself and its interface, that take away juice from the bukkit server.