Shopkeepers

Shopkeepers

2M Downloads

Failed to load shopkeeper 'x': Shopkeeper data migration failed!

galuxosi opened this issue ยท 2 comments

commented

Preliminaries:

  • Shopkeepers version: 2.17.1
  • Spigot version: This server is running Paper version git-Paper-193 (MC: 1.20.1) (Implementing API version 1.20.1-R0.1-SNAPSHOT) (Git: 581b683) You are running the latest version Previous version: git-Paper-183 (MC: 1.20.1)

  • I have checked that my issue/question does not get answered by:
  • I have checked all open and closed issues, but none seems to fit my issue/question.

Reproduction on a fresh and up-to-date Spigot server:

I was <able / not able> to reproduce my issue on a freshly set up and up-to-date Spigot server (currently <Insert output of /version command on up-to-date Spigot server>) with the latest version of Shopkeepers (currently <Insert latest tested Shopkeepers version>), with no other plugins and with no kinds of other server or client mods.

The issue:

Provide a detailed description of your problem and add as much information as possible which could help to reproduce the issue.

Include:

  • Description of the issue.
  • Step-by-step instructions on how to reproduce the issue.
  • Observed behavior.
  • Expected behavior.
  • If items with special attributes are involved: Include instructions on how to create those items.
  • Server logs (from server startup until issue). Consider enabling debug mode in the config for additional console output.
  • If modified from default: Plugin configurations.
  • ... Anything else that might be useful to reproduce and identify the issue.

I joined my server and I noticed that all my shopkeepers were dissapered, and when I wanted to create a new shopkeepers they don't save their products. I viewed logs and saw that all of my shopkeepers weren't loaded with error: "Failed to load shopkeeper 'X': Shopkeeper data migration failed!"
Logs: https://mclo.gs/HbJSfBH
I didn't change the config except debuging(I enabled it after finding this bug)

commented

same issue

commented

Duplicate of #842