TGravity chat spam
DalekCraft2 opened this issue ยท 3 comments
Describe the bug
Upon running /tgravity
to set a new Gravity Well block, the chat will send "That wool block is the wrong color, it should be PINK..." upon clicking any block, until a Pink Wool block is clicked. This is either a bug or weird design.
To Reproduce
- Run
/tgravity <direction>
- Click anything other than a Pink Wool block, repeatedly
- Click a Pink Wool block
/tardis version
output
Please include an output of your /tardis version
.
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] Server version: git-Paper-"809466f2e" (MC: 1.16.5)
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] TARDIS version: 4.6.1-b2263
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] TARDISChunkGenerator version: 4.6.1
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] PlaceholderAPI version: 2.10.9
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] LibsDisguises version: 10.0.24
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] Essentials version: 2.18.2.0
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] WorldGuard version: 7.0.4+f7ff984
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] Multiverse-Core version: 4.2.2-b812
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] WorldBorder version: 2.1.1
16:53:49.917
[16:53:49] [Render thread/INFO] [minecraft/NewChatGui]: [CHAT] [TARDIS] Checking for new TARDIS builds...
If you're adding a gravity well, why would you click a block other than a coloured wool block?
If you click a different block and get the error once, in order to achieve the desired result ie making a gravity well you would have to run the command again. I would find that far more annoying...
If that is the case, why does /tardis update
function similarly to what I suggested?