Applied Energistics 2

Applied Energistics 2

160M Downloads

Problems copying existing P2P channels (ATM9)

jinks opened this issue ยท 2 comments

commented

Describe the bug

When I try to copy an existing P2P channel onto a memory card, the P2P is instead reset to a new channel and then written to the card.

How to reproduce the bug

  • have empty memory card
  • shift-right-click on P2P connector

Expected behavior

Have the current frequency of the P2P channel written to the memory card.

Additional details

The channel does not always reset, sometimes it gets written properly to the card. While it seems at least partially random, I observed some patterns:

  • shift-clicking the input connector always resets the channel when the card is empty
  • output connectors can be copied most of the time
  • to copy an input connector it helps, when the card is already set to a frequency and that frequency is not the one being copied
  • if you copied a channel recently, it's more likely an subsequent copy will be successful

AE2 version 15.0.15

Which minecraft version are you using?

1.20

On which mod loaders does it happen?

Forge

Crash log

N/A

commented

So your behavior is basically the opposite of what I am experiencing.

Here is a sequence I could reliably reproduce multiple times:

  • have 2 linked input connectors
  • have 1 empty memory card
  • shift-click on input connector 1
  • a new channel is created and overrides the existing one
  • shift-click on input connector 2
  • existing channel is copied
  • shift-click on input connector 1 again
  • the (now empty) channel is copied
commented

I'm playing ATM9 as well, exact same AE2 version. I have no problem to copy the frequency from a ME P2P Tunnel (unlinked or input side) to a memory card (empty or already containing another freqency) reliably. Trying to copy from a ME P2P Tunnel (output side) to a memory card (empty or already containing another freqency) reinitializes the ME P2P Tunnel to a new frequency and configures it as an input side, which is unintuitive for me. The behavior is reliable, for me there is no "most of the time", "more likely" or other randomness involved.