Astral Sorcery

Astral Sorcery

63M Downloads

Blunt Bolts and Long Shot don't really do the opposite of one another, although their tooltip in the perk tree suggests they do

Jeuvke opened this issue ยท 5 comments

commented

Perk tree discriptions:

  • Blunt Bolts: The closer the enemy hit by a projectile, the more damage the projectile deals. If the monster is further away, it deals significantly less damage.
  • Long Shot: The further away the enemy hit by a projectile is, the more damage the projectile deals. If the enemy is closer, your attack deals significantly less damage.

Actual effect (assuming default config values and 0 added perk effect):
image

This means that Blunt Bolts gives arrows a multiplier between 0 incusive and 1.5 inclusive, and Long Shot a multiplier between 1 inclusive and 1.75 inclusive. To me this doesn't really feel like they're the opposite of each other.

Possible fixes:

  • Changing the perk tree tooltips
  • Buffing Blunt Bolts so it matches Long Shot more
  • Nerfing Long Shot so it matches Blunt Bolts more
commented

I got different results when trying to reproduce your +100% Perk Effect Graph's Long Shot series, but I could be wrong as well.
My one goes from 1x to 2.5x (at 80 blocks) where as your one goes from 2.5x to 3.5x (at 80 blocks).

I think what you say still kinda applies. Long Should implies that it should have a downside (less than typical damage at close range) but it doesn't.

It's interesting how Blunt Bolts scales with perk effect to be better than long shot (300% damage vs 250% damage), but starts off worse (150% damage vs 175% damage)

Calculations here.

+100% Perk Effect (this is different)

Damage vs Distance for +100% Perk Effect

Your graph

Bow Perk Multipliers (with +100% perk effect)

No Perk Effect (this is the same)

Expand

Damage vs Distance for no Perk Effect

Your graph

Bow Perk Multipliers

commented

With +100% perk effect, Blunt Bolts becomes a bit less crummy, but still not very great.

<deleted incorrect image, check BlueAgent's image instead>

commented

I updated both graphs since I am bad at maths and made some errors. They should be correct now.

commented

@BlueAgent you are indeed correct, I must've made another mistake somewhere. I don't know where though, since I actually forgot to save the graph sheet...

commented

This is true.
I thought i adjusted this at some point... turns out that didn't happen.
Will take a look at this.