You definitively making fun of me

You just completly throw off my suggestion to turn on by default an option

AND, the alternative that you suggest me doesn't work. https://baritone.leijurv.com/baritone/api/Settings.html#exploreForBlocks is already turned on by default and the bot STILLS turn off if he doesn't find ores, instead of like EXPLOREFORBLOCKS

Whats your suggestion ? (instead of just closing the issue without verifying if the issue is actually resolved in the first place and results with 5+ issue of the same problem i mean)

suggestion to turn on by default an option

is already turned on by default

Which is it?

Please enable exploreForBlocks. Also you can continue replying to an issue after it has been closed, I asked you to stop making new ones.

You
making
fun
of
me

Definitively

Why you don't listen

What the actual fuck

AND, the alternative that you suggest me doesn't work.

Can you even READ ?

You didn't even follow it.

Please read this.

Also where did I say I was making fun of you. If you have to defend something like that then you're most likely very young or immature.

exploreForBlocks is already turned on by default and the bot STILLS turn off if he doesn't find ores, instead of like EXPLOREFORBLOCKS

What the fuck ????

Yes it is

Please provide proof that it is.

It is not enabled then.

You really want a screenshot of "[Baritone] Old value: true" ? You kidding me right ? Tell me that it's a joke, please

Yes.

And proof that exploring isn't working.

That will be difficult because it just outputs me the message that he doesn't find ores and don't move, how i make a proof otherwise ?

Send a video of you turning on the option and it trying to explore.

What?

And what element of troubleshooting this will add ? Gimme an exemple

It will show the issue that is happening.

In order to correct the problem you need element of troubleshooting. And in this context, what this video will get you ? I already tells what it outputs. What a picture of the same message will get ? Isn't it just bad faith ?

I need a video of it not working.

Yeah okay, and about the troubleshooting ? you willnt get new logs, new error, just a footing of a steve failing to reach ores, what a novel

You actually NEED it, wow, okay, hold on

I wouldn't have asked otherwise.

Here you are big boy https://streamable.com/4n5e4

There's no diamonds for it to mine then.

Whats the WHOLE point of this topic ? Try to remember

Doesn't seem like it

Is the title even english?

I repeat the scenario

I ask to enhance "non legit mining"
You reply that I can manually enhance it
I ask for a new mode who integrate this enhancement
You still reply the same
I try to enhance manually following your instruction
It doesn't work, it don't explore to generate new chunks, new ores
I tell you that it doesn't explore, considering that the good option is activated
You reply "it doesn't see new ores"

You're a bot or a comic ?

I search for the bot to EXPLORE when he doesn't find chunks with ores, to go find new chunks

You know https://translate.google.com would probably give me a more comprehensible reply.

There isn't anywhere to explore because there's no ores to find. It's probably cached the chunks and already knows there's no diamond ore.

Look, the minecraft client doesn't know all the chunks. I know it because MYSELF i move manually and reactivate the "non legit mining" bot and he find ores

SO, i search for a way for the bot to do that automatically

It seems that the "legit mode" is perfect for walking, but he wasting a lot of time and ressources

SO, i want the bot to go to "legit mode" the time to find new ore with his scan. You seems to say that exploreForBlocks is the perfect function to perform that. I tell you that it doesn't work, you didn't believe me, i show you, you tell me "ah he doesnt find ores"

You get it or you need a Google Translate Human > Monkey ?

Oh. So you had legit mode on. So disable legit mode.

Please go view a new time the video and go repeat a new time that "you had legit mode on"

I really want to punch you now, you're the king of avoidance

Instead of just tell me if it's possible to work on a "reach new chunks" function you tell me useless things

The fact that you auto-close the issue is on himself a sign of your willing to not do anything about the case, from the start

You closing it like to say "it's not software related, the problem is the user", and at each replies you redirect the problem to me, you never listen to me, you never understand that the software lacks a function, a funtion to avoid the auto deactivation of the bot, for him to continues the search without human interaction, you indefinitely avoid the real concern. What type of people you are in the real life ? It's more 6 opened issues about your social problems than the Baritone problem

Jesus christ, get your shit together @bphd!

You do realize that we obviously have a communication problem here, right? Use Google Translate because WE - DO - NOT - UNDERSTAND - YOU and your English skills are absolute garbage.

I really want to punch you now, you're the king of avoidance

Honestly, everyone in this conversation wants to punch you in the face for opening several issues nobody understands and on top of that has an incorrect format! You didn't even read the fucking requirements to open an issue, don't complain when your issues get rejected.

You closing it like to say "it's not software related, the problem is the user", and at each replies you redirect the problem to me, you never listen to me, you never understand that the software lacks a function, a funtion to avoid the auto deactivation of the bot, for him to continues the search without human interaction, you indefinitely avoid the real concern.

Well guess what? Did you ever evaluate yourself against other people speaking/writing English? No? Then don't complain when nobody deciphers what the fuck you wrote.

What type of people you are in the real life?

We could be suicidal and thinking about committing suicide because of your stupidity.

It's more 6 opened issues about your social problems than the Baritone problem

Sorry mate, you got that wrong. Those 6 issues are your social problems.

Sorry @S-B99 but I can't take this shit. My principles include that you've to earn your respect and this dude earned himself a negative score. I don't care about a person when that person is a moron.