Massive log spam, GL ERROR
lightning02 opened this issue · 10 comments
I'm using Botania r1.8-249.jar with Psychedelicraft 1.5.2 and i get this error.
Since I don't like make duplicates i will refer to this other post that is the same problem, still not solved.
Vazkii quit Botania development a long time ago, and the agreement with
Willie doesn't allow him to work on 1.7 Botania, so no, it won't be fixed.
1.7 is ages old, anyway. Don't know why people keep making packs for it.
This is no sense... why Vazkii would let botania die in that way??.. it's sad
Because she had wanted to quit its development for a long time, and finally just gave up when she broke and added the passive config back. Willie is, at this point, the de-facto maintainer of Botania. It's not dead, it's just moved on.
Turn off shaders in the config, your GPU is somehow ancient and can't use them, if I'm right with what I'm seeing
I have a gtx 960 and i'm not the only one getting this error, this error happens no matter what grafic card do you use, it's somehow a fault regarding psychedelicraft, seems that psyche would conflict with every other mod that use any kind of shaders.
Btw you're right turing off shaders in botania config solve the problem from botania side
This repository is no longer maintained! This issue won't be fixed, sorry.
This reply is a macro.
Well I understand.. many modders are moving to 1.9, but well.. at least the bug fixes for 1.7.10(that is still a very popular version for mods) would be nice
Vazkii quit Botania development a long time ago, and the agreement with
Willie doesn't allow him to work on 1.7 Botania, so no, it won't be fixed.
1.7 is ages old, anyway. Don't know why people keep making packs for it.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:50 PM lightning02 [email protected]
wrote:
Well I understand.. many modders are moving to 1.9, but well.. at least
the bug fixes for 1.7.10(that is still a very popular version for mods)
would be nice—
You are receiving this because you commented.Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1846 (comment)