It's time to make the BC licensing system a bit more modern. First - re-license the API under the MIT license. I need the permissions of following people to continue:

@SpaceToad
@CovertJaguar
@SirSengir
@Krapht
@AEnterprise
@Prototik
@cpw
@tambry
@Parker8283
@dmillerw
@Kyprus
@TXX59
@ganymedes01
@darkevilmac
@sfPlayer1
@simon816

Please post that you permit the BuildCraft team to relicense the BuildCraft API, by which I mean the contents of the api/buildcraft folder, as well as all related build scripts, documentation and other content necessary to use the API, below.

(I'd also like to keep you all wary - there might be a CLA signing project coming up soon to get BuildCraft under a single ownership entity so that future decisions can be made easier)

The API's status was always questionable at best. You have my blessing to make it MIT.

Should've been done a while ago. You have my permission

You have my permission. Good luck!

You have my permission.

I didn't see any real reason for relicensing, but you have my permission anyway.

I give permission for the BuildCraft team to relicense the BuildCraft API.

Yea go ahead. The more open source the better.
On Nov 28, 2014 5:06 PM, "darkevilmac" [email protected] wrote:

I give permission for the BuildCraft team to relicense the BuildCraft API.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2248 (comment)
.

Permission granted.
Also, I'm back from the grave!

you have my permission to change the licence

I'm just a passer-by TBH, but I support this change 👍

@simon816 - Law is law and I need all of your permissions to do that, even if it's just 3 lines of code.

You have my permission.

Permission granted.

You have my permission

Permission granted

ok with me

Ok for me!

Apparently all of @AartBluestoke's code was removed with the BC 6.0 Builder API rewrite. Commencing re-license...