CC: Tweaked

CC: Tweaked

57M Downloads

Turtle placing refined storage disk drive crashes save and make it unplayable

VoidDave opened this issue ยท 1 comments

commented

Minecraft Version

1.16.x

Version

1.100.3

Details

When turtle places disk drive anywhare on the word. save become unplayable.
logs:
2022-04-10-17.log

commented

Stack trace for convenience

net.minecraft.crash.ReportedException: Ticking block entity
	at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_71190_q(MinecraftServer.java:855) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.server.dedicated.DedicatedServer.func_71190_q(DedicatedServer.java:291) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_71217_p(MinecraftServer.java:787) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_240802_v_(MinecraftServer.java:642) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_240783_a_(MinecraftServer.java:232) ~[?:?]
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_292]
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No network node present at BlockPos{x=1487, y=66, z=-4415}, consider removing the block at this position
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.tile.NetworkNodeTile.getNode(NetworkNodeTile.java:65) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.tile.NetworkNodeTile.getNode(NetworkNodeTile.java:24) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.block.NetworkNodeBlock.onDirectionChanged(NetworkNodeBlock.java:78) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.block.BaseBlock.checkIfDirectionHasChanged(BaseBlock.java:49) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.block.BaseBlock.func_196243_a(BaseBlock.java:42) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.block.NetworkNodeBlock.func_196243_a(NetworkNodeBlock.java:69) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at net.minecraft.block.AbstractBlock$AbstractBlockState.func_196947_b(AbstractBlock.java:616) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.world.chunk.Chunk.func_177436_a(Chunk.java:267) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.world.World.func_241211_a_(World.java:199) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.world.World.func_180501_a(World.java:176) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.world.World.func_175656_a(World.java:283) ~[?:?]
	at com.refinedmods.refinedstorage.item.blockitem.BaseBlockItem.func_195941_b(BaseBlockItem.java:23) ~[refinedstorage:1.9.17]
	at net.minecraft.item.BlockItem.func_195942_a(BlockItem.java:54) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.item.BlockItem.func_195939_a(BlockItem.java:39) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraftforge.common.ForgeHooks.onPlaceItemIntoWorld(ForgeHooks.java:651) ~[forge:?]
	at net.minecraft.item.ItemStack.func_196084_a(ItemStack.java:186) ~[?:?]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtlePlaceCommand.doDeployOnBlock(TurtlePlaceCommand.java:286) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtlePlaceCommand.deployOnBlock(TurtlePlaceCommand.java:242) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtlePlaceCommand.deploy(TurtlePlaceCommand.java:122) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtlePlaceCommand.execute(TurtlePlaceCommand.java:79) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtleBrain.updateCommands(TurtleBrain.java:788) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.core.TurtleBrain.update(TurtleBrain.java:133) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at dan200.computercraft.shared.turtle.blocks.TileTurtle.func_73660_a(TileTurtle.java:217) ~[computercraft:1.100.3]
	at net.minecraft.world.World.func_217391_K(World.java:491) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.world.server.ServerWorld.func_72835_b(ServerWorld.java:371) ~[?:?]
	at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_71190_q(MinecraftServer.java:851) ~[?:?]
	... 5 more

I'm afraid this is a vanilla bug, see #691 (comment) - my understanding is that you can reproduce this with any "block placer" block entity.

Unfortunately this does mean there's nothing we can really do on our end, it really requires either a patch in Forge or individual mods to work around it themselves. It might be worth reporting this to the Refined Storage people too, to see if they're willing to do the latter.