Guidelines

• By checking this box, I am saying that I have read the guidelines and believe to be following them to the best of my ability

Description of feature request

(forgot #1943 suggested this already, but ill keep it open just incase the devs think if this differently or something. Also there are some differences compared to #1943 but at its core its the same)

I think to truly sell the debris rings, there would be a chance clusters would simply orbit around the wither storm for some time before the orbit decays and the cluster falls into the storm. For performance reasons there should be a customizable limit (and by extension making this feature a toggle) of how many rotating clusters can be active at once. Rotating clusters would also be rendered much farther than normal clusters.

Also as the wither storms suction isn't that strong in phases 0-3, i believe 0-3 should only be able to rotate single-block clusters imo atleast. Maybe for the sake of this being more noticeable only large clusters would be affected by this feature on phase 4 and up

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

yk i keep forgetting that your basically one step ahead of everyone, because of how easily you can come up with stuff. Whats the suggestion number/issue?

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

Oh it was #1943 right? i even commented on it

Honestly ill keep it open just incase the developers changed there minds, also there are few minor differences in mine compared to yours.

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

Oh it was #1943 right? i even commented on it

Honestly ill keep it open just incase the developers changed there minds, also there are few minor differences compared to it.

Beat me to it lol

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

Oh it was #1943 right? i even commented on it
Honestly ill keep it open just incase the developers changed there minds, also there are few minor differences compared to it.

Beat me to it lol

XD

I made this a suggestion already, it was rejected

Oh it was #1943 right? i even commented on it
Honestly ill keep it open just incase the developers changed there minds, also there are few minor differences compared to it.

Beat me to it lol

Looks like its being added.