[Bug]: CurioEvents
2929762171 opened this issue ยท 4 comments
Minecraft Version
1.19.2
What happened?
Using kubeJS.
CurioDropsEvent when gamerule keepInventory=false, cancelling event will 'eat' all equipped curios.
CurioUnequipEvent will fire 3 times, like this:
I need line 39~41 to make sure to skip the first time check, and set it 'allow' so it can run into the second time check. Skipping the third fire seems no problem.
How do you trigger this bug?
...
Loader
Forge
Loader Version
forge 43.3.7
Mod Version
curios-forge-1.19.2-5.1.6.3
Relevant Log Outputs
No response
CurioDropsEvent when gamerule keepInventory=false, cancelling event will 'eat' all equipped curios.
This is intended, as it works the same as the more global LivingDropsEvent. It prevents the drop behavior, not the fact that the items are removed (which is controlled by the keepInventory
gamerule itself).
CurioUnequipEvent will fire 3 times, like this:
Could you clarify the nature of the bug you're reporting? Is it just the fact that the event is firing 3 times? Does your script, as you've written it, work as you intend or is it not working correctly due to a potential bug?
return before client check, fire many times:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/000afede-5250-4dfb-83ac-a547f430ccf3
after client check, event fire 3 times:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f03f12f-1df2-41e7-aec6-2555f037b38d
if I try to do something, like change player's xp, it will also change 3 times:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cda9f55-4a33-4e92-afe3-9af4258cd320
CurioDropsEvent when gamerule keepInventory=false, cancelling event will 'eat' all equipped curios.
This is intended, as it works the same as the more global LivingDropsEvent. It prevents the drop behavior, not the fact that the items are removed (which is controlled by the
keepInventory
gamerule itself).CurioUnequipEvent will fire 3 times, like this:
Could you clarify the nature of the bug you're reporting? Is it just the fact that the event is firing 3 times? Does your script, as you've written it, work as you intend or is it not working correctly due to a potential bug?