LuckPerms

LuckPerms

41.4k Downloads

Users not automatically assigned to the default group

emanuele3d opened this issue ยท 7 comments

commented

Hi everybody, my name is Manu, i am typing from Switzerland and I'm a dad setting up a server for the children of our neighborhood to help them stay healthy and entertained while we are collectively fighting the coronavirus with self-isolation.

I am using LuckPerms (v5) and I am puzzled because it appears nobody by default is in the default group. Is this the expected behaviour? If not, how can I debug what is going on?

Thanks for your help!

commented

It should be noticed I did read the page https://github.com/lucko/LuckPerms/wiki/Default-Groups but I see nothing to suggest this is the normal behaviour.

commented

The group default should be assigned on join.
Could you provide us with the output of /version and the exact version of LuckPerms?

(Also hello from a fellow person in switzerland ๐Ÿ‘‹)

commented

Hmmm... interesting, I just found something.

If I try to add people to the default group I get:

[user] already inherits from default () in context global

However, if I use /lp groups default listmembers

There is only one user listed in the group out of 4 connected to the server, and I never assigned them to any group.

commented

Listmembers won't work reliably on the default group. This is iirc an intentional behaviour due to its programming

commented

Ah. That would explain it. =)

It still makes sense to assign permissions to the default group though right? So that normal users have a set of permissions? From the page mentioned above it's not clear if the author is discouraging the use of the default group.

commented

I'm closing this as @Andre601 last reply addressed the issue. Thank you Andre!

commented

If you want to check if a user is actually in the default group or not, just run /lp user <user> info and it should tell you ;)