Server Crash caused by CableUtils.emit in Gas Burning Generator
smilodon79 opened this issue ยท 9 comments
Version:
MekanismGenerators-1.12.2-9.7.5.376.jar
Mekanism-1.12.2-9.7.5.376.jar
MekanismTools-1.12.2-9.7.5.376.jar
Issue:
Server crash caused by Mekanism Gas Burning Generator in CableUtils.java , line 149
Scenario:
I have several gas burning generators in a compact dimension. It's been running fine for a long time. But crashed all of a sudden. Appreciate a look-see and a possible patch please.
Crash Stack Trace:
java.lang.Error: ServerHangWatchdog detected that a single server tick took 60.00 seconds (should be max 0.05) at java.lang.Object.hashCode(Native Method) at java.util.HashMap.hash(HashMap.java:339) at java.util.HashMap.put(HashMap.java:612) at java.util.HashSet.add(HashSet.java:220) at mekanism.common.util.CableUtils.emit(CableUtils.java:149) at mekanism.generators.common.tile.TileEntityGenerator.onUpdate(TileEntityGenerator.java:64) at mekanism.generators.common.tile.TileEntityGasGenerator.onUpdate(TileEntityGasGenerator.java:55) at mekanism.common.tile.prefab.TileEntityBasicBlock.func_73660_a(TileEntityBasicBlock.java:86) at net.minecraft.world.World.func_72939_s(World.java:1835) at net.minecraft.world.WorldServer.func_72939_s(WorldServer.java:613)
This is not necessarily caused by mekanism, if the server watchdog kills the server literally anything can appear there
Indeed, without actual profiling data, the crash means nothing except Mekanism was running when the server had enough of waiting
Indeed, without actual profiling data, the crash means nothing except Mekanism was running when the server had enough of waiting
i give you my crash report
No, @rickyhoho that is not the same crash as OP. Your is one that has already been fixed (#5485 and its many duplicates), you need to update Mekanism to the latest version
No, @rickyhoho that is not the same crash as OP. Your is one that has already been fixed (#5485 and its many duplicates), you need to update Mekanism to the latest version
thank you for reply