Mekanism

Mekanism

111M Downloads

PRC infinitely sends substrate

jacksin125 opened this issue ยท 5 comments

commented

Please use the search functionality before reporting an issue. Also take a look at the closed issues!

Issue description:

When I set the PRC to output the substrate to a logistic pipe connecting to a chest so I can, you know, keep producing power, the PRC just infinitely outputs substrate. I don't know how it's coded at all, but my guess is that the substrate in the output slot is not getting deleted when it sends it through the pipe.

Steps to reproduce:

1.Connect PRC to a basic or advanced logistical transporter
2.Place a chest at the end of the transporter
3.Set the PRC to output items in the right slot

Version (make sure you are on the latest version before reporting):

Forge: forge 1.15.2 31.1.25
Mekanism: Mekanism 1.15.2 9.9.16.408
Other relevant version:

If a (crash)log is relevant for this issue, link it here: (It's almost always relevant)

No crash log, as there is no crash.
[gist / pastebin / etc link here. Please make sure that it isn't set to expire.]

commented

I keep getting the

06Oct2021 23:51:38.656] [MCMT-Pool-Thread-2/WARN] [Mekanism/]: An inventory's returned content count does not line up with TileTransitRequest's prediction.
--
[06Oct2021 23:51:38.656] [MCMT-Pool-Thread-2/WARN] [Mekanism/]: TileTransitRequest item: 1 inferium_essence, toUse: 1, ret: 1 air

log spam too, here's a link to the debug.log:

https://gist.github.com/Serial-Comma/9050ba5aa22cf5d490bd2cec0b5ef134

commented
commented

I found a message in the logs that might help:

[22Mar2020 22:47:31.000] [Server thread/WARN] [Mekanism/]: An inventory's returned content count does not line up with InvStack's prediction.
[22Mar2020 22:47:31.001] [Server thread/WARN] [Mekanism/]: InvStack item: 64 substrate, ret: 1 air
[22Mar2020 22:47:31.003] [Server thread/WARN] [Mekanism/]: Tile: mekanism.common.tile.TileEntityPressurizedReactionChamber@77a89262 BlockPos{x=-171, y=57, z=260}

This error repeats many times.

EDIT: Sorry, I did not see that it was closed for being a duplicate before sending this message.

commented

That is fine, and that log message will probably help. I plan to look at it some point before the next alpha, though it will be a bit as I am in the middle of rewriting our energy system.

commented

Just want to thank you for posting a detailed issue with specifically relevant logs. Reports like this make our job so much easier.