[Request] Alternate Blocks For Crafting Tables

Question

[Request] Alternate Blocks For Crafting Tables

Darkosto opened this issue 8 years ago · 9 comments

Darkosto commented 8 years ago

Minecolonies version

1.10.2-0.6.3277 on Curse

The Builder's hut level 2 needs Crafting Tables for correct construction, and my modpack does not use vanilla tables. I absolutely love MineColonies and think it works really well for the pack idea. Is it possible to allow an alternate crafting table to be used in its place so users can upgrade their colonies?

Thank you very much for your consideration!
Darkosto

Raycoms · Answer 1 · 2017-03-28T17:41:01.000Z

hmm you can rescan the builder hut with your custom table and put it in the jar of your modpack. That'd work =) 2017-03-28 14:37 GMT-03:00 Darkosto <[email protected]>:

…

Minecolonies version 1.10.2-0.6.3277 on Curse The Builder's hut level 2 needs Crafting Tables for correct construction, and my modpack does not use vanilla tables. I absolutely love MineColonies and think it works really well for the pack idea. Is it possible to allow an alternate crafting table to be used in its place so users can upgrade their colonies? Thank you very much for your consideration! Darkosto — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#747>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGI9y8VD-EmRsrJTk-P4kRIixWFCwHJLks5rqUVpgaJpZM4Mr9H6> .

Darkosto · Answer 2 · 2017-03-28T17:42:53.000Z

Will Curse allow altered jar files in public modpacks?

Raycoms · Answer 3 · 2017-03-28T17:45:19.000Z

Should be no problem. 2017-03-28 14:42 GMT-03:00 Darkosto <[email protected]>:

…

Will Curse allow altered jar files in public modpacks? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#747 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGI9y_FFzcpjx_jQ4gbHMKNasdzs7CClks5rqUaegaJpZM4Mr9H6> .

Darkosto · Answer 4 · 2017-03-28T17:48:07.000Z

Alright, thank you!

Raycoms · Answer 5 · 2017-03-30T15:11:13.000Z

@xavierh like an option to only enable style from folder and not from jar? 2017-03-30 10:41 GMT-03:00 xavierh <[email protected]>:

…

@Raycoms <https://github.com/Raycoms> I wonder If I should add an option to NOT use the schematic from the jar? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#747 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGI9yx7FRLWEvLTMCveEkxFKkvYkK8F3ks5rq7ELgaJpZM4Mr9H6> .

xavierh · Answer 6 · 2017-03-30T15:16:25.000Z

@Raycoms that's right, if a server only want to use it own huts because they want a specific theme to it, it would be better to disable schematic from the jar and only use the folders one.
In my branch the only way is to override all schematics

Raycoms · Answer 7 · 2017-03-30T15:17:49.000Z

Sure I think that would make sense. 2017-03-30 12:16 GMT-03:00 xavierh <[email protected]>:

…

@Raycoms <https://github.com/Raycoms> that's right, if a server only want to use it own huts because they want a specific theme to it, it would be better to disable schematic from the jar and only use the folders one. In my branch the only way is to override all schematics — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#747 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGI9y8-QTN2Jwju-0jIR935M91PCybLfks5rq8dJgaJpZM4Mr9H6> .

xavierh · Answer 8 · 2017-03-30T13:41:31.000Z

@Raycoms I wonder If I should add an option to NOT use the schematic from the jar?

Raycoms · Answer 9 · 2017-04-05T14:57:42.000Z

Soon to come feature.

Share to

Minecolonies version