Cant remove forestry recipes properly
JasonMcRay opened this issue · 16 comments
When i try to remove for example all carpenter recipes for humus (there are 2 recipes - one regular and one from crated humus) with mods.forestry.Carpenter.removeRecipe(<Forestry:soil>)
it will remove only one recipe at random. Whenever I reload the scripts, it will return the removed recipe and will remove the second one.
Fixed in #153
Found a workaround: I need to have 2times the same line to remove both recipes.
remove it twice if you have two recipes.
mods.forestry.Carpenter.removeRecipe(Forestry:soil);
mods.forestry.Carpenter.removeRecipe(Forestry:soil);
@JasonMcRay
I see you make Gt Recipes for your pack too. I make addon mod for minetweaker adding fluid support and missing gt 5 machnines. http://forum.industrial-craft.net/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=11353
Nette Werbung @Dream-Master ;) @JasonMcRay a new build was just built, please test it with that. Otherwise @Voidi shall take a look at it.
@Yulife Kann es auch löschen wenn es euch stört.
Wäre übrigens sehr schön wenn eure aktuellen Builds verfügbar währen auch ohne Passwort.
@jaredlll08 (in english)I can delete it when you want. It would be very nice if the Nuilds are available on Jenkins and not locked with a password.
Ne ne, ist ok :) Ist ja im Endeffekt zur Hilfe der Anderen.
Jared muss das machen. @jaredlll08 open up the Modtweaker2 jenkins!
@Yulife
Danke
@Yulife Danke. Bin noch am Anfang mit meinen Java Kenntnissen. Werden aber immer mehr ;-)
@jaredlll08 (in english)Thanks. I just beginning with Java but i think i will learn more in the future
Jared you nazi. If @Dream-Master is more comfortable in German and I speak it too, he is allowed to use it. @Dream-Master Try to put a translation into English under your German text though.
From now on, whenever I see german or any other language besides english, I am automatically closing the issue...
Wow call the jew a nazi... GG, the probldm is, i have no idea what you guys
are talking about... So yea...
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Martin [email protected] wrote:
;-)
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#103 (comment)
.