Open Terrain Generator (OTG)

Open Terrain Generator (OTG)

9M Downloads

Bug: Server lag if chunks are pregenerated

KorDum opened this issue ยท 4 comments

commented

I have a terrible TPS on my server (3+ players with 66 mods) if I using Biome Bundle 6.1 and pregen 500 chunks. All living entities are moving with pauses. In console without erros, only overloaded warning.
But if don't start (and finish) pregen, all fine.

commented

Hey, sorry to disappoint you but pre-generation simply causes lag, it is quite heavy for the server. It is advised to use pre-generation either in single player (and then copy the pre-generated world to a server) or on a server while noone is playing (or only admins are online). Pre-generation is not intended to be used on servers with active players.

commented

No, lags causes AFTER complete pregeneration. TPS 20, but living entities are moving with pauses.
Without pregeneration all ok.

commented

Hmm. Maybe is it related?
#94

commented
19:23:12] [LagSpikeProfiler/INFO] [TickProfiler]: 
The server appears to have lag spiked.
Last tick 0.20088643s ago."Server thread" RUNNABLE
        at com.pg85.otg.WorldSession.GetParticlesForChunk(WorldSession.java:157)
        at com.pg85.otg.forge.events.ServerEventListener.findChunksForSpawning(ServerEventListener.java:516)
        at com.pg85.otg.forge.events.ServerEventListener.onServerTick(ServerEventListener.java:618)
        at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.eventhandler.ASMEventHandler_296_ServerEventListener_onServerTick_ServerTickEvent.invoke(.dynamic)
        at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.eventhandler.ASMEventHandler.invoke(ASMEventHandler.java:90)
        at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.eventhandler.EventBus.post(EventBus.java:179)
        at net.minecraftforge.fml.common.FMLCommonHandler.onPostServerTick(FMLCommonHandler.java:264)
        at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.func_71217_p(MinecraftServer.java:710)
        at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.run(MinecraftServer.java:524)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Yes, it's duplicate