Railcraft

Railcraft

34M Downloads

Railcraft not loading in dev. enviro [1.7.10]

draknyte1 opened this issue ยท 8 comments

commented

So, whenever I try load Railcraft_1.7.10-9.12.2.1 or a deobf version of such, Eclipse fails to load.

[Obf] - https://pastebin.com/f6wJ9NWN
[Deobf] - https://pastebin.com/wHVg1J5H
[Deobf-No Chisel2] - https://pastebin.com/0F8y2FyU

Any thoughts on the matter mate?

commented

@draknyte1

  1. For obf, the printSignalDebug field exists here: https://github.com/Railcraft/Railcraft-API/blob/master/mods/railcraft/api/signals/SignalTools.java#L17
    (this is 1.7.10)
    My conclusion is that one of your mods ships a broken railcraft api.

  2. For deobf, how can you make us responsible for codechicken's coremod hacks?

    at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.LaunchClassLoader.getClassBytes(LaunchClassLoader.java:370) ~[launchwrapper-1.12.jar:?]
    at codechicken.core.asm.MCPDeobfuscationTransformer.getParents(MCPDeobfuscationTransformer.java:209) ~[CodeChickenCore-1.7.10-1.0.7.47-dev.jar:?]
    at codechicken.obfuscator.ObfuscationMap.evaluateHeirachy(ObfuscationMap.java:219) ~[CodeChickenCore-1.7.10-1.0.7.47-dev.jar:?]
    at codechicken.obfuscator.ObfuscationMap.lookupObfMethod(ObfuscationMap.java:187) ~[CodeChickenCore-1.7.10-1.0.7.47-dev.jar:?]
    at codechicken.obfuscator.ObfRemapper.mapMethodName(ObfRemapper.java:64) ~[CodeChickenCore-1.7.10-1.0.7.47-dev.jar:?]
commented

@liach, I was just posting both logs for reference. :)

Hmm, I'll see what else ships a RC API. Probably GT.

commented

Or the api may be transformed by some transfromer (coremod)

commented

hrnng, neither links here work.
http://www.railcraft.info/releases/9-12-2-0

And I can't see anything else in my modlist for dev declaring RC API, nor anything outside GT that touches RC.

I would prefer not to use a Bon2'd copy of RC, lol.

commented

So @CovertJaguar should fix the link to stupid dropbox which changed all its link formats, breaking all dev/api downloads and emblems.

commented

Well, It seems GT grabs 9.4.0.0 from Maven.. so, the issue is probably from GT (Which I obviously can't remove from Dev, lol)

Might have to see about fixing that then, since 9.4.0.0 loads as expected.

commented

Ah. Hope the api/dev and dropbox drama may end soon.

commented

I already had a copy of 9.4.0 dev from my GT workspace, just annoying that I'd like to use 9.12.x in my personal workspace but GT isn't liking it in Dev.

Outside of Dev GT seems to load as expected. shrug
Doesn't seem to be an issue on RC though :)