simplestoragenetwork Not compatible with Overloaded 1.16.3-1.16.4
IchigoGames opened this issue ยท 19 comments
Minecraft 1.1.6.3 and 1.16.4
SimpleStorageNetwork-1.16.3-1.2.0 also tested SimpleStorageNetwork-1.16.3-1.3.0
Overloaded-1.16.3-0.0.90
jei-1.16.4-7.6.0.58 tested both jei-1.16.3-7.6.0.51
without jei SimpleStorageNetwork will crash when you open interface.
Single player or Server:both
this is a issue with overloaded and simplestoragenetworks a compatible issue with the two mods that messed up the text rendering on the storage interface this happens in 1.16.3 and in 1.16.4
video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DqTqrp1cFk&ab_channel=IchigoGames
log https://www.dropbox.com/s/b4fzyxcur616v6b/debug.log?dl=0
I am a bit lost can see your latest.log as the issue occured? Also it may be a localization bug (though this is my first time seeing anything like this)
Yeah looks like compatibility. by itself mod is fine, and text looks like not from this mod. thanks
Start with anything that modifies core files. So anything that has a library mod.
For reference, the only text i have should be the tooltips on the buttons, or tooltips when you hover on the text bar. no just raw text always written
so add this mod + overloaded and jei without jei simple SimpleStorageNetwork will crash when you open storage interface then place that block down open storage interface and you will see the issue.
The author needs exact versions and video confirmation ... mod authors don't typically just test and issue. I recommend OBS.
latest.log always helps too ... since the bug is obscure you will need a great deal more detail.
You need to be able to recreate it with just the devs mod or the offending mods. Otherwise, your barking up the wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DqTqrp1cFk&ab_channel=IchigoGames the video you requested and the log https://www.dropbox.com/s/jdv8socnxhygmf6/latest.log?dl=0 iv edited the info above to show version numbers for mods used in test can also be seen in video.
CJ-MC-Mods/Overloaded#103 just in case its a issue on overloaded side iv reported the same info to them
@P3rf3ctXZer0 anything im missing ?
would it be better if close then and open as new issue as its no longer true that this cannot be replicated
reuploaded as #323 to make it easier to-read understand