GSE: Sequences, Variables, Macros

GSE: Sequences, Variables, Macros

8M Downloads

Step priority

Bobby21677 opened this issue · 16 comments

commented

It appears that when using step priority, the macro will start on the 1234 part of the step function instead of 1 12 123...etc

This explains why I see issues many times at the beginning of the fight after macro reset.

Here is a link to a video that I made of testing this: https://youtu.be/5cLbsb7ZUaY

commented

Am I seeing this correctly or is there something that I need to do differently within GSE

commented
commented

Sorry Timothy, the box is checked grey. Also, it is resetting to the first spell when leaving combat in the video.

commented
commented

There’s a link in the first post that isn’t working for some reason...I’m new to GitHub.

https://youtu.be/5cLbsb7ZUaY

commented

That one worked for me. And in the options, it shows reset on combat.

commented

Is this behaving now in 2.6.35?

commented

Yes, it is behaving the same way in 2.6.35. The macro resets to the first spell, but nothing seems to reset the first step in the step function. In fact, I can't find anything that resets the priority steps other than reloading the addon. Also, if I press the macro while not in combat (some of the spell are defensive) the macro won't reset. I noticed that there are keybinds that can be set to manually reset the macro...would it be possible to add an amount of time, where if the macro isn't pressed, it resets? Like reset=5. I would be happy to create a video again or share screen and test with you. I'm concerned that you weren't able to recreate this...makes me feel like I'm missing something.

commented
commented

I've created a test version for you - https://www.curseforge.com/wow/addons/gse-gnome-sequencer-enhanced-advanced-macros/files/3139888 Could you have a look at it? Its marked as version 2.6.35-3

commented

Priority is still not resetting to the first step with this version.

commented

if it works i will release it at 2.6.36 but for now this is 2.6.35-4

commented

It looks like this is working correctly! Thank you sir!

commented
commented