The Aether

The Aether

35M Downloads

Aether Performance Improvement

rainysux opened this issue · 5 comments

commented

What Feature Types Apply to This Bug?

No response

Other Type

No response

What Type of Bug Is This?

Performance

Forge Version

1.47.1.3

The Aether Version

The Aether - 1.20.1-1.0.0-beta.1.4-neoforge

Is This Bug a Conflict With Another Mod?

No response

Client Log

No response

Crash Report (if applicable)

No response

Steps to Reproduce

Run in a server
Run Spark
See aether usage outside of the aether

What You Expect To Happen

Hoping for this ti be improved upon

What Actually Happened

I noticed that the aether is ticking for biomes and entities almost every tick while youre not in it

Additional Details

devs in the modernfix discord recommend this to improve performance “they can rewrite the logic to be entity-specific
to be in entity ticking” “they should do that too, but reordering the if statements would already be enough to fix the problem and they shouldn't bother doing any of this logic when not in the aether”

Please Read and Confirm The Following

  • I have confirmed this bug can be replicated without the use of Optifine.
  • I have confirmed this bug is on the most recently supported version of Minecraft.
  • I have confirmed the details provided in this report are concise as possible and does not contained vague information (ie. Versions are properly recorded, answers to questions are clear).
  • I have confirmed this issue is unique and has not been reported already.
  • If playing on a modpack, I have reported this issue to their issue tracker already.
commented

I personally have any performance issues with the aether. Are sure it's not an add-on causing that?

commented

I personally have any performance issues with the aether. Are sure it's not an add-on causing that?

Its not a issue per say but its something that can be improved upon.

commented

It's unnecessary for it tick for the aether to tick for biomes and entities even while you're not in it

commented

Sounds to be a duplicate of #1841.