A certain block (even when its empty) stops getting rendered beyond a certain distance and a hole is visible instead
heyjudek opened this issue ยท 4 comments
Expected Behavior
Normally, there should not be a hole in the area surrounded with the red circle as there are solid blocks over there.
Actual Behavior
Instead of the blocks, one sees a hole when one gets away from that area beyond a certain distance. Approaching back to that area fixes the problem. Also, destroying the block directly to the right of it also fixes the problem and everything is rendered properly from all distances. However, adding that block back will make re-create that hole from over a
certain distance again
Reproduction Steps
- Once the distance between the player and that block is small enough, it gets rendered
- Stepping away from it makes that hole visible again
- Destroying the block directly to the right of it fixes the problem as the hole is no longer visible even from far away
- Re-adding the block reintroduces the exact same problem. Tested with stone, cobblestone and dirt blocks.
Attachments
https://www.mediafire.com/file/2p3gslzbpwccygh/My_own_world.zip/file
Here's the video explanation of the problem - https://streamable.com/995yas
System Information
- Java Version: 1.8.0_271 64-bit
- CPU: 4900MQ
- GPU: GTX 680M SLI
Merging this into tracking issue #1898.
Sodium doesn't use the Minecraft culling algorithm afaik. This is where the Sodium chunk culling code lives:
1.16.x/next: https://github.com/jellysquid3/sodium-fabric/tree/1.16.x/next/src/main/java/me/jellysquid/mods/sodium/client/render/chunk/cull1.16.x/stable: https://github.com/jellysquid3/sodium-fabric/blob/1.16.x/stable/src/main/java/me/jellysquid/mods/sodium/client/render/chunk/ChunkRenderManager.java#L102
Yes, I am aware, but I phrased my comment poorly. As Jelly explained in the comment I referred to:
"Sodium already fixes a few problems in vanilla's chunk occlusion, but ultimately we'd want to replace occlusion culling all together with a faster and more aggressive algorithm."
Sorry for any confusion :). Also, if I'm missing something, please let me know.